Company name CA, Inc.
Stock ticker CA
Live stock price [stckqut]CA[/stckqut]
P/E compared to competitors Good

MANAGEMENT EXECUTION

Employee productivity Fair
Sales growth Poor
EPS growth Good
P/E growth Fair
EBIT growth Good

ANALYSIS

Confident Investor Rating Fair
Target stock price (TWCA growth scenario) $36.05
Target stock price (averages with growth) $194.8
Target stock price (averages with no growth) $303.68
Target stock price (manual assumptions) $27.93

The following company description is from Google Finance: http://www.google.com/finance?q=ca

CA, Inc. (CA) is an independent enterprise information technology (IT) management software and solutions company. CA develops and delivers software and services. The Company operates in three segments: Mainframe Solutions, Enterprise Solutions and Services. The Company addresses components of the computing environment, including people, information, processes, systems, networks, applications and databases, across hardware and software platforms and programs. It offers a portfolio of software solutions, including mainframe; service assurance; security (identity and access management); service and portfolio management, and virtualization and service automation. It delivers its products on-premises or, for certain products, using Software-as-a-Service (SaaS). In June 2013, the Company announced it has completed the acquisition of privately-held Layer 7 Technologies.

 

Confident Investor comments: At this time, I think that a Confident Investor can cautiously invest in CA, Inc. as long as the price is correct. Most of the fundamentals of this company are good but there are some concerns.

If you would like to understand how to evaluate companies like I do on this site, please read my book, The Confident Investor. You can review the best companies that I have found (and I probably invest my own money in most of these companies) in my Watch List.

How was this analysis of CA, Inc. calculated?

For owners of my book, “The Confident Investor” I offer the following analysis (you must be logged in to this site as a book owner in order to see the following analysis). If you have registered and cannot see the balance of this article, make sure you are logged in and refresh your browser.
[s2If current_user_can(access_s2member_level1)]

In order to assist you in using the techniques of this book, the values that I used when calculating the Manual pricing above were:

  • Stock price at the time of the calculation: $29.49
  • Growth: 0.09
  • Current EPS (TTM): $1.72
  • P/E: 17
  • Future EPS Calc: $2.64
  • Future Stock Price Calc: $44.98
  • Target stock price: $27.93

I hope that this makes you a better investor. [/s2If]

The financial and technical news is buzzing this week about Google’s [stckqut]goog[/stckqut] acquisition of Motorola Mobility Inc. [stckqut]mmi[/stckqut] My general rule is that when a company acquires another company that is bigger than 10% of the parent then a Confident Investor needs to get cautious. Google’s revenue is $33.3B and Motorola Mobility’s revenue is $12.7B. Too many companies get very confused and get lost during a merger of this size and this is quite likely to happen here. For this reason, I am removing Google from my Watch List until Google has had some time to integrate MMI.

When the news of the merger first broke, the discussion was all about Google buying the robust library of patents that Motorola Mobility owned. While this is an immediate benefit to Google as they fight in the very litigious environment of mobile platforms, it would be foolish to limit this acquisition to just that portfolio.

Google is paying $12.5B for MMI. This is a pretty high premium to pay for the rights to the patents. If Google just wanted the rights to protect against lawsuits then they could have licensed these patents for far less money. Of course, Kevin Smithen, an analyst from Macquarie USA, thinks that Google only wanted the patents and will spin off the hardware business relatively quickly.

If Smithen is correct then the various Android manufacturers have nothing to fear. In fact, this would be the best of all worlds in that MMI will be severely confused as it moves into Google and then shuffled back out to private equity or some other manufacturer. This would be a recipe for near death for MMI going through that many transitions and their competitors will take advantage of that confusion. The various phone manufacturers would also enjoy the fruits of Google’s largess and have fewer patent problems as Apple[stckqut]aapl[/stckqut], Microsoft [stckqut]msft[/stckqut], and Oracle [orcl[/stckqut] try to stop or get a piece of the Android revenue stream.

However, I do not think that Google will miss the opportunity to compete with their top competitor: Apple. It is very clear that the Android OS will continue to be the most popular mobile phone OS just like Windows on the desktop is the most popular OS. However, just like on the desktop, the preferred vendor is Apple. Whenever a new phone running Android is introduced, it is compared to the gold standard, the iPhone.  Whenever a new version of Android comes out, it is compared to the gold standard, iOS. Whenever a new tablet comes out, it is compared to the gold standard, iPad.

I do not think that that Google wants to be the Microsoft of the phone. Rather, their culture is much closer to being like Apple. If you look at all of the products from Google (usually creating little to no revenue for the company) most of them are about defining and creating a great user experience. This is what Apple has almost always tried to do. The one place that Google doesn’t do this is in mobile phones where their OS, Android, is placed on so many different form factors that they no longer have a great user experience across the entire platform.

The addition of MMI to Google gives them the unique opportunity to create a phone platform that is tightly coupled between hardware and software that is only seen in products from Apple or Research In Motion [stckqut]rimm[/stckqut]. There, though, is the rub. Few companies have been successful at running a business that is equal parts hardware and software. Apple is the only one true success in that area while others were successful for awhile and then struggled (think RIM and Palm). Most companies do not do a great job of being great in both hardware and software. Rather, they focus on hardware (think HP[stckqut]hpq[/stckqut], Dell[stckqut]dell[/stckqut], and Lenovo) or they focus on software (think Microsoft, CA[stckqut]ca[/stckqut], and Oracle[stckqut]orcl[/stckqut]) and they let the other side be “good enough” to support the core. Yes, HP makes software but that isn’t the core of their business and, for the most part, their software is designed to operate their great hardware. Similarly, Microsoft makes computer mice but few people consider this to be the core of what Microsoft is. For years, Oracle was a software only company until they bought Sun, another company that struggled being a software company and a hardware company.

Apple though has carved out a unique position in that they make great software and equally great hardware and they combine the two together to enable an awesome user experience. That is what Google has the potential to do with MMI. It won’t be easy and they could elect to take the easy way out and spin off the hardware business. In addition to being incredibly difficult to do well, it is also risky in that their Android partners would be very unhappy about a well integrated Android phone competing with a “stock” phone running Android. The road to excellence may force Google to upset their partners a great deal and Google simply may not be up to the task of accomplishing this goal.

The Motorola Mobility deal also allows Google to be excellent in another area that is dominated by no one and may be even bigger than mobile phones. Motorola generated nearly $3.6B in set-top boxes and services for television. Google has dabbled in this area of the market without much huge success. The combination of Google’s software with Motorola’s set-top infrastructure could create an integrated environment that would have everyone else on the outside looking in on a very strong revenue stream.

This acquisition could be only about protecting Android from patent suits but that would be a shame since Android doesn’t add significantly to Google’s bottom line. If Google wants to be truly great, this acquisition could be about trying to learn from Apple and teaching the master a trick or two. The question is: can Google out-Apple Apple? While this will be interesting to watch, I would prefer to watch it from the sidelines and not as an investor so I will sit back for a few months to see how this proceeds.